Evidently, it is now completely socially acceptable for banks to openly discriminate against middle-aged and older employees

By Jack J. Kelly


Bloomberg recently reported that UBS, the large Swiss-based bank, will be paying the lion share of bonuses to their highest earners and, additionally, their youngest (millennial) employees.

If you are wondering, no, not the youngest and biggest profit generators. Millennials are getting these bonuses solely because they are, well… millennials. The logic behind UBS’ decision, which, according to Bloomberg, is now becoming the norm on Wall Street, is that banks need to pay their younger staff exceptionally well to keep them from defecting to Silicon Valley and tech start-ups.

It used to be that Wall Street was the go-to place for eager, money-hungry, status-seeking, Ivy League alumni. As Wall Street caused a little thing called the financial crisis, engaged in market rigging, Ponzi schemes, money laundering scandals, and rung up hundreds of billions of dollars in fines, the best and brightest college kids started having second thoughts about a career in investment banking. You know what? I’m being too politically correct here. I’m sure that they really couldn’t care less about these shenanigans, as long as they could make enough money to pay off their student loans, get a loft apartment in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, Lamborghini, and a cool place in the Hamptons. It’s just now that they don’t need Wall Street to achieve these materialistic goals. Silicon Valley and tech companies can offer an easier and quicker path to riches. Real player cheddar, yo – millions and sometimes billions in stock after their company goes IPO – type money. These kids don’t have to settle for a measly $200k and listen to a boring, stuffy 35- year-old dinosaur pontificate about spreadsheets.

I think there is something even more sinister involved.  By rewarding the big producers and keeping the younger staff happy, the middle-aged people will be squeezed out. It is a not-so-subtle message to employees in their late 30’s on up that if they don’t produce profits, they are gone. Their job will be relocated to a cheaper location and they won’t be invited to go there. A junior person will take their comfortably worked-in seat. It is a blatant statement that if you are of a certain age and not a top-producer, you are not welcome here anymore. It’s time to be put out to pasture.

Would any bank or company do this to any other group? They would not dare to cherry-pick a racial, ethnic, religious, or gender group of people to pull back on bonuses and make them feel irrelevant and unwanted.

Also, what type of message are the banks sending to this group of privileged, young people? The banks are creating an environment where they’re reinforcing the stereotype of “everybody deserves a gold star” mindset that millenials are accused of having been raised with.  It will lead them to have a false sense of entitlement and unearned sense of self-worth, which may doom them to long-term failure.



About admin

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: