заказать Крем Naron онлайн
онлайн заказать Крем Naron
купить Крем Naron онлайн доставка
заказать Крем Naron онлайн с доставкой
Крем Naron доставка курьером
дешевый Крем Naron купить
Крем Naron москва
купить Крем Naron интернет аптека
интернет аптека онлайн
заказать Крем Naron интернет аптека
Крем Naron москва купить
интернет аптека москва
дешевая интернет аптека
дешевая интернет аптека москва
дженерики купить онлайн
Крем Naron интернет аптека москва
Крем Naron интернет аптека
купить Крем Naron питер
Крем Naron онлайн санкт-питербург
Крем Naron московская область купить онлайн
Крем Naron московская область
дешевый Крем Naron купить онлайн cialis super active deutschlandwhat is cialis super activehow long does cialis super active lastwhat is cialis super active plusdifference between cialis super active cialis professionalwhat is generic cialis super activehow does cialis super active workprednisolone prednisolone prednisolone side effects buy prednisolone online prednisolone acetate buy prednisolone prednisolone 5mg

Killing the “Job-Killing Regulation” Meme

From Bloomberg:

The phrase “job-killing regulation” has become a standard part of the political lexicon this campaign season, most often used to disparage President Barack Obama‘s energy and environmental policies.

But a new report suggests we ought to take claims of regulatory-related unemployment with a grain of salt. The Institute for Political Integrity, a nonpartisan think tank associated with the New York University School of Law, finds many of the studies purporting to show mass job losses — or gains — from environmental rules use poorly executed economic models that do not accurately measure true costs and benefits.

The study’s findings could help the White House deflect pressure to jettison or delay environmental rules that critics say will cost jobs.

A case in point: Two studies purporting to measure the employment impact of two Environmental Protection Agency rules came to wildly different conclusions. A report commissioned by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity estimates the two rules, which seek to curb air pollution, will result in a 1.4 million job loss. A review of the two rules by the Political Economy Research Institute estimates a 1.4 million job gain.

The difference stems from the types of models the researchers use and the assumptions they make. But too often, the study finds, those assumptions and the limitations of the research are not disclosed.

For instance, in assessing a new environmental rule that will require a plant to close, economists can come to different conclusions about the job impact based on their assessment of the labor market. If an economist assumes a flexible labor market, in which workers move from one sector to another in response to job openings, the impact will be minimal. But if an economist assumes a tight labor market in which jobs are hard to come by, the impact will be much greater.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

prozac 40 mg reviewsfluoxetine msds prozac ocd dosagefluoxetine xanax fluoxetine oral solutionfluoxetine generic for prozac fluoxetine capsules usp 20 mgcheap sildalis online